They accused the venue, and parent company, Rush Street Gaming, on several counts: Automatic Card Shufflers Main Culprit for Legal Actions Against Venueīy the claims of Mattia and Vespe, the casino’s shufflers were not working properly.Īs a result, they lost money playing blackjack, poker and mini-baccarat. ![]() When Pennsylvania officially launched its online gaming market, the brand’s online version PlaySugarHouse was the first gaming site in the state available via Apple mobile devices. Since both gamblers have decided to withdraw their lawsuit, SugarHouse is off the hook for now.Īs one of the oldest and most reputable casinos in Philadelphia, this venue offers a “premier gaming and nightlife experience in the city.” Its $164 million expansion brought new amenities, featuring six restaurants, luxurious event space, a seven-story parking garage and more. ![]() … they had been cheated out of potential winnings for almost a year due to the malfunctioning of the venue’s automatic card shufflers.Īnthony Mattia reported the alleged loss of $147,000 at the casino while William Vespe claimed on another $103,000 in losses. ![]() In May of this year, two gamblers launched a lawsuit against SugarHouse Casino, claiming…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |